Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand order could be sustained when the tax, penalty and interest demanded in the order exceeded the amount specified in the show-cause notice.
Analysis: Section 75(7) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 prohibits confirmation of a demand in excess of the amount specified in the notice and also bars confirmation on grounds other than those stated in the notice. The notice in the present case specified a lower amount, whereas the impugned order raised a substantially higher demand, including penalty and interest beyond the notice. Such variation was held to be contrary to the statutory mandate.
Conclusion: The impugned demand order could not be sustained. The writ petition was allowed, the order was quashed, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after affording an opportunity to file a response and be heard.