Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an order passed under Section 73 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 could be sustained when no opportunity of personal hearing was afforded after the reply to the show cause notice was filed.
Analysis: The notice under Section 73 had fixed a date for personal hearing, but the reply was filed after that date and before the impugned order was passed. The authority had sufficient time thereafter to offer a hearing, yet the adverse order was made without doing so. In the circumstances, the denial of personal hearing was contrary to the statutory requirement reflected in Section 75(4), which mandates an opportunity of hearing before an adverse order is passed. The petitioner was thereby deprived of an to substantiate its stand against the deficiency noticed by the authority.
Conclusion: The impugned order could not be sustained and was quashed. The matter was remanded to the authority to grant personal hearing and pass a fresh order in accordance with law.