Tax exemption for government securities, trust income and annuity receipts turned on private ownership, resident status and the governing agreement.

Interest on Nizam Government promissory notes was treated as exempt because the securities were held as private property and the governing notification applied. Sovereign immunity was unavailable once the assessee was not shown to retain international personality, so liability to tax arose as an ordinary resident. For trust securities, exemption under the third proviso to the income-tax provision was confined to income-tax on the Family Trust and Miscellaneous Trust securities and did not extend to super-tax or to other trusts. The annual sum under the Princess Niloufer arrangement was characterised as income, but it remained exempt under the 1949 agreement because the transferee could enforce the attached tax protection.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether interest on the Nizam Government promissory notes was exempt from tax. (ii) Whether the assessee was liable to income-tax and whether interest from securities held under the specified trusts was exempt, in whole or in part, under the notification and the third proviso to section 8. (iii) Whether the annual sum of Rs. 1 lakh received under the Princess Niloufer arrangement was income and, if so, whether it was exempt under the agreement dated October 8, 1949.

Issue (i): Whether interest on the Nizam Government promissory notes was exempt from tax.

Analysis: The interest was received on securities held by the assessee as his private property. The earlier Supreme Court decision had held that such interest fell within the exemption granted by item 8 of the notification dated March 21, 1922, issued under section 60 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The same principle governed the interest in question for the years under reference.

Conclusion: The interest on the Nizam Government promissory notes was exempt from tax and the answer was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was liable to income-tax and whether interest from securities held under the specified trusts was exempt, in whole or in part, under the notification and the third proviso to section 8.

Analysis: The claim of sovereign immunity failed because the assessee was not shown to have retained international personality and, after 1 April 1950, he was liable to tax as an ordinary resident. For the trust securities, the Family Trust and Miscellaneous Trust involved income-tax-free securities, so the interest was exempt from income-tax under the third proviso to section 8 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, but not from super-tax, and not under item 8 of the notification once the securities ceased to be the private property of the assessee. The other three trusts did not involve income-tax-free securities and no exemption was available in their respect.

Conclusion: The assessee was liable to income-tax and had no sovereign immunity; exemption was available only to the limited extent of income-tax on the Family Trust and Miscellaneous Trust securities, but not for super-tax or for the other trusts.

Issue (iii): Whether the annual sum of Rs. 1 lakh received under the Princess Niloufer arrangement was income and, if so, whether it was exempt under the agreement dated October 8, 1949.

Analysis: The annual receipts were not mere return of capital but represented income in the nature of an annuity purchased for a lump sum. The agreement of October 8, 1949, together with the trust deed, assured that the payments and the corpus from which they arose would be free from income-tax and allied imposts. The transferee of the beneficiary's rights could stand in the shoes of the original beneficiary, and the assessee therefore came within the protection of the agreement.

Conclusion: The annual sum of Rs. 1 lakh was income, but it was exempt from tax under the agreement dated October 8, 1949, and the answer was in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered partly for the assessee and partly for the revenue: immunity from tax was denied, limited exemption was recognised for specified trust income, and the Princess Niloufer receipts were held taxable as income but exempt from tax under the agreement.

Ratio Decidendi: Interest on Government securities is exempt only where the governing statutory notification or proviso squarely applies, sovereign immunity from income-tax is unavailable absent international personality, and a transferee of an actionable claim may enforce the tax exemption attached to the underlying agreement.

---