Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether goods imported under a passbook scheme could be confiscated and penalty imposed under Section 111(o) of the Customs Act, 1962 when the condition attached to the exemption had not yet become operative against the importer.
Analysis: Section 111(o) applies only where goods exempted from duty subject to a condition are brought within the mischief of confiscation because the condition is not observed by the importer within the prescribed time, or within a reasonable time where no period is fixed. The goods had not been cleared by the respondents, and the stage for compliance with the condition had not yet arisen. On those facts, the breach contemplated by Section 111(o) could not be attributed to the respondents, and no independent basis for confiscation or penalty was shown.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to confiscation under Section 111(o), and the penalty could not be sustained; the reference questions did not arise.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal's view was upheld, and the Revenue's reference application failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Confiscation under Section 111(o) is attracted only after the importer fails to observe the exemption condition within the prescribed or reasonable time; until that stage is reached, confiscation and consequential penalty are premature.