Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order was liable to be quashed in view of the petitioner having settled the service tax dispute under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 and having been issued a discharge certificate.
Analysis: The petition challenged the order-in-original on the ground of violation of natural justice. The record showed that the petitioner had invoked the Sabka Vishwas scheme, paid the quantified amount, and was issued a discharge certificate by the authority. The respondents verified the issuance of the discharge certificate and fairly accepted that the petition deserved to succeed. In these circumstances, the ex parte adjudication could not survive once the underlying dispute had already been settled under the scheme.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed and set aside in favour of the petitioner.