AMP expenditure cannot alone prove an international transaction or justify transfer pricing adjustment without tangible evidence.

Excessive Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion expenditure by itself does not establish an international transaction for transfer pricing purposes. Chapter X permits substitution of the transaction price with arm's length price only after the Revenue first proves, by tangible material, that an agreement, understanding, or arrangement exists between the assessee and its associated enterprise. The bright line test is not a permissible method to identify such a transaction or to compute arm's length price. In the absence of foundational evidence of an international transaction, the remand to the Transfer Pricing Officer was unwarranted and the AMP adjustment could not be sustained.

---

---

Issues: Whether Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion expenses could be treated as an international transaction warranting transfer pricing adjustment and whether remand to the Transfer Pricing Officer was justified.

Analysis: The Tribunal had remanded the matter on the premise that the existence of an international transaction in relation to AMP expenditure required fresh determination. The Court noted that its earlier decisions had consistently held that excessive AMP expenditure by itself does not establish an international transaction, that the bright line test is not a permissible method for identifying such a transaction or for computing arm's length price, and that Chapter X contemplates substitution of the transaction price with the arm's length price only where an international transaction is first shown to exist. In the absence of tangible material showing any agreement, understanding, or arrangement between the assessee and its associated enterprise regarding AMP spend, the foundational premise for remand was not made out.

Conclusion: The remand was unwarranted and the AMP adjustment could not be sustained; the issue is answered in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: An international transaction for AMP expenditure cannot be presumed from excessive spend alone, and transfer pricing adjustment under Chapter X cannot rest on the bright line test or any quantitative adjustment unless the Revenue first establishes the existence of such a transaction by tangible material.

---