Bail cancellation set aside as the Supreme Court restored the original bail order subject to existing conditions.

The Supreme Court found, on the facts before it, that bail was warranted and that the order cancelling bail could not stand. It interfered with the cancellation order, restored the trial court's bail order, and directed that the original bail conditions continue to apply. The operative effect was that the appellant remained on bail subject to the conditions previously imposed by the trial court.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order cancelling the appellant's bail was justified and whether the earlier bail order should be restored.

Analysis: The Court found that, on the facts placed before it, a case for bail was made out. It therefore interfered with the order cancelling bail and restored the trial court's order granting bail. The conditions imposed by the trial court were directed to continue to apply to the appellant.

Conclusion: The cancellation of bail was set aside and the appellant's bail was restored, subject to the trial court's original conditions.

---