Bail cancellation set aside and trial court bail restored where the facts supported continued release.

The Supreme Court held that the order cancelling bail could not be sustained on the facts before it. Finding that a case for bail had been made out, it set aside the cancellation order and restored the trial court's bail order. The original bail conditions were directed to continue to apply to the appellant, and the earlier grant of bail was reinstated.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order cancelling the appellant's bail was justified and whether the earlier bail order ought to be restored.

Analysis: The bail granted by the trial court had been cancelled by the High Court on the respondent's application. On the facts placed before it, the Court found that a case for bail was made out and that the cancellation order could not be sustained. The Court accordingly set aside the impugned order and restored the trial court's bail order, making the original bail conditions applicable to the appellant.

Conclusion: The cancellation of bail was not sustained and the appellant was entitled to restoration of bail on the conditions imposed by the trial court.

---