2025 (3) TMI 933 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT deletes notional interest income addition on loan to private company, allows appeals against section 147 reopening

Laxminarayan Mandir Trust Versus Asst. CIT, Circle 1, Mumbai

ITAT Mumbai allowed assessee's appeals against reopening of assessment u/s 147 for addition of notional interest income on loan/advance to a private ... Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Addition of interest income - HELD THAT:- Respectfully following the decision of the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the assessment year 2013-14 [2023 (11) TMI 930 - ITAT MUMBAI] we do not find any merits in the addition on account of notional interest income in the hands of the assessee, and accordingly, the same is deleted. Proceedings u/s 147 also initiated on the basis of the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2013-14, and it was alleged that the interest income in respect of loan/advance to M/s Ramgopal Ganpatrai & Co. Pvt. Ltd. has escaped assessment. As in assessee’s own case for the assessment year 2013-14 cited supra, we do not find any merits in the addition on account of notional interest income in the hands of the assessee, and accordingly, the same is deleted. Appeals by the assessee are allowed. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe core legal issues considered in this judgment are:1. Whether the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in passing orders without providing an adequate opportunity for a hearing and without conducting a relevant inquiry.2. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to consider the Tribunal's prior order for the assessment year 2013-14, which held that no notional interest could be charged to tax unless income is received or accrues.3. Whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in upholding the Assessing Officer's decision to charge the differential interest between the actual interest received and the market rate as taxable income.4. Whether the initiation of proceedings under section 147 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 was justified based on the assessment proceedings for the assessment year 2013-14.ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS1. Adequate Opportunity for Hearing and InquiryThe relevant legal framework involves the principles of natural justice, which require that an assessee be given a fair opportunity to present their case. The Tribunal considered whether the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) provided this opportunity before passing the orders. The Tribunal found that the lack of adequate opportunity and inquiry contravened these principles, impacting the fairness of the proceedings.2. Consideration of Tribunal's Prior OrderThe Tribunal's prior order for the assessment year 2013-14 was crucial, as it established that notional interest could not be charged unless income was actually received or accrued. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to consider this precedent, which was directly applicable to the current assessment years. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency and adherence to established legal principles.3. Charging of Differential Interest as Taxable IncomeThe Tribunal examined the legal provisions under sections 13(3), 13(1)(c), and 13(2)(a) of the Income Tax Act, which concern the conditions under which a trust may lose its tax exemption. The Assessing Officer had added the differential interest to the taxable income, arguing that the interest rate charged was below the market rate. The Tribunal, however, highlighted that the provisions do not authorize the computation of notional interest when no real interest is accrued or received. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer's approach was inconsistent with the legal framework and prior Tribunal decisions.4. Justification for Initiating Proceedings under Section 147The initiation of proceedings under section 147 was based on the assessment for the year 2013-14. The Tribunal found that since the addition for notional interest in the 2013-14 assessment was deleted, the basis for initiating proceedings for the years 2011-12 and 2012-13 was invalid. The Tribunal concluded that the proceedings lacked merit and were not justified.SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGSThe Tribunal held that:- The addition of notional interest income to the assessee's taxable income was without merit, as established in the prior Tribunal decision for the assessment year 2013-14. The Tribunal stated, 'Section 13(2)(a) of the Act also does not authorize the Revenue to compute the notional interest, in case no such interest is charged by the trust.'- The proceedings under section 147 for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were unjustified, given the deletion of similar additions in the 2013-14 assessment.- The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both assessment years, thereby deleting the additions made on account of notional interest income.