Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the rejection of the application for approval under section 80G, based on mention of an incorrect clause in Form 10AB, could be sustained, and whether the matter required remand for fresh consideration under the correct provision.
Analysis: The assessee pointed out that the reference to section 80G(5)(iv)(B) in Form 10AB was an inadvertent error and that the intended provision was section 80G(5)(iii)(B). The factual position was not controverted by the Revenue. In view of the mistake and the surrounding circumstances, the impugned rejection could not stand and the application required reconsideration on the basis of the correct clause.
Conclusion: The rejection order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh decision by treating the application as one made under section 80G(5)(iii)(B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Final Conclusion: The assessee obtained relief by way of remand, with the earlier rejection displaced and the application restored for reconsideration on the correct statutory basis.
Ratio Decidendi: An application for tax approval cannot be rejected merely because of an inadvertent misdescription of the relevant statutory clause in the prescribed form where the correct provision is identifiable and the mistake is undisputed.