2025 (3) TMI 619 - AT - Income Tax

Leave encashment exemption under Section 10(10AA)(ii) allowed up to Rs. 25,00,000 following notification 31/2023

Dashrath Kumar Sen Versus ACIT, NeFAC-1 (2), Delhi

ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee's appeal regarding leave encashment exemption under Section 10(10AA)(ii). The tribunal held that following notification ... Exemption claimed u/sec. 10(10AA)(ii) - claim of the assessee for leave encashment received at the time of retirement - HELD THAT:-The limit of leave encashment to be claimed by the assessee was revised to Rs. 25,00,000/- as specified vide notification No. 31/2023/F. NO. 200/3/2023- ITA-1 dated 24th May, 2023 and therefore, the assessee is eligible to to claim Rs. 9,60,409/- as claim eligible for deduction of the said amount of Rs. 9,60,409/- and Id. AO is directed to allow the claim of the assessee within the revised limit as prescribed. Since the issue has already been decided by the bench [2023 (6) TMI 1476 - ITAT JAIPUR] and same was followed in [2023 (10) TMI 1506 - ITAT JAIPUR] Thus, we direct the Id. AO to allow the claim to the extent of the revised limit as per the circular as referred herein above. Appeal of the assessee is allowed. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe primary legal issue in this case revolves around the interpretation and application of Section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, specifically regarding the exemption limit applicable to leave encashment received by employees of Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) at the time of retirement. The core questions considered are:1. Whether the assessee, a retired employee of a PSU, is entitled to claim an exemption on the entire leave encashment amount of Rs. 9,60,409 under Section 10(10AA)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, or if the exemption is limited to Rs. 3,00,000 as per the existing provisions at the time of filing the return.2. Whether the amendment to Section 10(10AA) increasing the exemption limit to Rs. 25,00,000, effective from 1.4.2023, can be applied retrospectively to the assessment year 2020-21.ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS1. Exemption Limit under Section 10(10AA)- Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: Section 10(10AA) of the Income Tax Act provides for an exemption on leave encashment received at the time of retirement. Subsection (i) applies to government employees, while subsection (ii) pertains to employees other than government employees, including PSU employees, with a maximum exemption limit of Rs. 3,00,000 as per the last notification issued in 2002.- Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal examined the provisions of Section 10(10AA) and the arguments presented by the assessee, who claimed that the exemption limit should align with the highest salary in the government sector. The Tribunal noted that the limit for non-government employees had not been revised since 2002, whereas government salaries had significantly increased.- Key Evidence and Findings: The Tribunal considered the assessee's argument that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had not issued a new notification to reflect the increased salary levels of government employees, which should correspondingly increase the exemption limit for non-government employees.- Application of Law to Facts: The Tribunal acknowledged the discrepancy between the exemption limits for government and non-government employees and the lack of an updated notification. However, it emphasized that the law, as it stood at the time of filing the return, capped the exemption at Rs. 3,00,000 for non-government employees.- Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Tribunal considered the assessee's argument for retrospective application of the revised limit introduced in 2023, but concluded that the amendment was prospective and could not apply to the assessment year 2020-21.- Conclusions: The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, limiting the exemption to Rs. 3,00,000, as per the prevailing law during the relevant assessment year.2. Retrospective Application of Amendment- Relevant Legal Framework and Precedents: The amendment to Section 10(10AA), effective from 1.4.2023, increased the exemption limit to Rs. 25,00,000. The Tribunal referred to a Kerala High Court decision, which held that the amendment could not be applied retrospectively.- Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Tribunal reiterated that legislative amendments are generally prospective unless explicitly stated otherwise. The notification increasing the limit was issued after the assessment year in question and did not contain any provision for retrospective application.- Key Evidence and Findings: The Tribunal noted the absence of any government notification or legislative intent to apply the revised limit retrospectively to prior assessment years.- Application of Law to Facts: The Tribunal applied the principle of prospective application of tax laws, affirming that the revised limit could not be applied to the assessment year 2020-21.- Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's contention for retrospective application, citing the absence of legal backing for such an interpretation.- Conclusions: The Tribunal concluded that the amendment to Section 10(10AA) was prospective and not applicable to the assessment year 2020-21.SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS- Verbatim Quotes of Crucial Legal Reasoning: 'As per the provisions of section 10(10AA), employees other than the Government employees are eligible to claim maximum leave encashment exemption of Rs. 3 Lakhs at the time of retirement. There was no Government notification increasing the exemption limit for leave encashment at the time of filing the return of income for the impugned year.'- Core Principles Established: The Tribunal reinforced the principle that tax exemptions are governed by the law as it stands during the relevant assessment period, and any amendments are generally prospective unless explicitly stated otherwise.- Final Determinations on Each Issue: The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities, limiting the exemption for leave encashment to Rs. 3,00,000 for the assessment year 2020-21, and rejected the claim for retrospective application of the revised limit introduced in 2023.