TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Special Leave Petition Dismissed for 246-Day Delay; No Satisfactory Explanation Provided</h1> <h3>THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS) WARD 1 (1) PUNE & ORS. Versus SHRI DNYANESHWAR MAHARAJ SANSTHAN ALANDI DEWACHI</h3> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 'gross delay of 246 days' in filing, which was 'not satisfactorily explained.' The dismissal was ... Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reason to believe - information received from the Investigation Officer, Kolhapur that Petitioner made some cash deposit by assessee-trust - as decided by HC [2024 (3) TMI 954 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] no live link, which is a sine qua non between the material before the AO in the present case and the belief which he has to form regarding escapement of income. The sanction u/s 151 of the Act granted by the prescribed authority as well as the notice is issued by the Department without any application of mind. Decided in favour of assessee. HELD THAT:- There is a gross delay of 246 days in filing the Special Leave Petition which has not been satisfactorily explained by the petitioner. Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay. The Supreme Court, presided over by Hon'ble Justices J. B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan, dismissed the Special Leave Petition filed by the petitioner due to a 'gross delay of 246 days' in filing, which was 'not satisfactorily explained.' The dismissal was based on the ground of delay. All pending applications related to the case were also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
