Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to condonation of transit loss up to 1% in respect of petroleum products cleared for export warehousing under the applicable circular and notification framework.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the effect of the circular dated 30.10.1985 in the context of export warehousing of petroleum products. The impugned order proceeded on the footing that the circular remained operative and that the warehousing/export arrangement continued under Notification No. 46/2001-CE(NT) dated 26.06.2001. The Tribunal found support for that view in the later judicial treatment of the same issue, including the recognition that transit loss up to 1% in movement from refinery to warehouse for export purposes is permissible and that the relevant circular was not rendered inoperative merely because the general petroleum warehousing facility had been withdrawn.
Conclusion: The respondent was entitled to benefit of condonation of transit loss up to 1%, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where export warehousing for petroleum products continues under the governing notification framework, a circular permitting condonation of transit loss up to 1% remains applicable unless expressly withdrawn or superseded, and duty cannot be demanded for transit loss within that limit.