Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Tax Dispute Dismissed Over Low Impact; Legal Questions Unresolved, Applications Disposed</h1> <h3>ADDITIONAL/JOINT/ DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. Versus CUMMINS INDIA LIMITED</h3> SC dismissed a special leave petition due to a tax effect of less than 5 crores, with the Revenue opting not to pursue it. The Court left the legal ... Maintainability of appeal before Supreme court on low tax effect - TP Adjustment - MAM for Royalty payment - TNMM or CUP - as decided by HC [2023 (8) TMI 458 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] wherein as concur with Appellant that having accepted the TNMM method as the most appropriate, it was not open to the TPO to subject only one element, i.e, payment of royalty, to an entirely different CUP method. HELD THAT:- It is stated that the tax effect is less than ₹5 crores; hence, the Revenue would not press the present special leave petition. In view of the statement made, the special leave petition is dismissed as not pressed, leaving the question(s) of law open. In view of the aforesaid order, we are not examining the application for condonation of the delay. The Supreme Court, with Hon'ble Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar presiding, dismissed a special leave petition as the tax effect was less than 5 crores, and the Revenue decided not to press the petition. The Court left the question(s) of law open and did not address the application for condonation of delay. Pending applications were disposed of accordingly.