Concessional sugar sales by co-operative factory require fresh fact-finding where Supreme Court directions and statutory circulars remain unexamined.

Concessional sale of sugar by a co-operative factory required fresh factual examination because the record did not fully address the Supreme Court's directions in Krishna SSK or the Sugar Commissioner's circular under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. The Tribunal noted that the enquiry had to cover whether the concession was backed by a State Government resolution, whether it reflected an established industry custom, and the basis for fixing the quantity sold at concessional rates. As these matters were unresolved, the deletion of the addition was not finally sustained and the disputed addition was restored for de novo adjudication; the Revenue succeeded only for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the deletion of the addition relating to sale of sugar at concessional rate to members and related persons was sustainable, and whether the matter required de novo adjudication in the light of the Supreme Court directions and the Sugar Commissioner's circular.

Issue (i): Whether the deletion of the addition relating to sale of sugar at concessional rate to members and related persons was sustainable, and whether the matter required de novo adjudication in the light of the Supreme Court directions and the Sugar Commissioner's circular.

Analysis: The addition arose from the difference between the market price and the concessional rate charged for sugar supplied by a co-operative sugar factory. The Tribunal noted that the controversy had to be examined in the light of the Supreme Court's directions in Krishna SSK, which required verification of whether the concessional sale was supported by a State Government resolution, whether it reflected an established custom in the co-operative sugar industry, and the basis for fixing the quantity sold at concessional rates. The record also showed a circular issued by the Sugar Commissioner under section 79A of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 regulating concessional sugar sale, including a cap of 5 kg per member per month and limiting the concession to members and employees. The Tribunal held that the earlier High Court decision relied on by the assessee was distinguishable on facts and did not displace the later Supreme Court directions and the State circular. Since the factual matrix had not been fully examined in the manner required, the deletion could not be sustained finally.

Conclusion: The issue was set aside for fresh consideration and the Revenue succeeded for statistical purposes.

Final Conclusion: The common order resulted in remand of the disputed addition for fresh adjudication, and the Revenue's appeals were treated as allowed only for statistical purposes.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the taxability of concessional sale of sugar by a co-operative sugar factory depends on unresolved factual questions specifically required to be examined by the Supreme Court and by relevant statutory directions, the matter must be restored for de novo adjudication rather than finally decided on an incomplete record.

---