Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and the consequential notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were liable to be set aside for non-consideration of the reply filed by the assessee and for granting less than the statutory time under Section 148A(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The writ petition challenged the notice under Section 148A(b), the order under Section 148A(d), the notice under Section 148 and the approval under Section 151 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the ground that the assessee was given only five days to respond instead of the statutory period and that the reply sent on email within time was not considered before passing the order under Section 148A(d). The Revenue fairly accepted that the petitioner should be afforded one more opportunity to respond. The Court accepted this position and held that the reply already filed had to be considered before any further action.
Conclusion: The order under Section 148A(d) and the consequential notice under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were set aside, and the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to consider the existing reply and pass a fresh order.