Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. Here it shows just a few of many results. To view list of all cases mentioning this section, Visit here

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>CESTAT Upholds Tetmosol Soap Reclassification as Toilet Soap; Penalty Set Aside</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad upheld the reclassification of Tetmosol Soap as toilet soap under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, settling ... Soap- Penalty- The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of soaps of different varieties such as Nivea Soap, Johnson & Johnson Baby Soap and Tetmosol Soap etc., on job work basis. The dispute in the instant case relates to the classification of Tetmosol Soap manufactured by the Appellant on job work basis for M/s. Nicholas Piramal India Limited. The appellant had classified the product as a β€œSoap, other than for toilet use, whether or not containing medicament or disinfectant” under sub heading 3401.11 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. On the basis of said classification, the appellant opted to discharge appropriate duty applicable. The department took the stand that the impugned product is not a medicated soap and hence ought to be reclassified as toilet soap under sub-heading 3401.19 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Consequent on such reclassification the department demanded the differential duty as well as penalty for the period May 2003 to December 2003 by issuing show cause notice to the appellants. Held that- The Tribunal passed the order on 13-5-2005, whereas the show cause notice related to the year 2003. Therefore, it cannot be said that there was any suppression of facts or willful mis-declaration, fraud or collusion etc. In view of the above position, while on merits, we find that appellants have no case and therefore, they are required to pay the duty demanded with interest as applicable, penalty imposed on them under Section 11AC read with Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 is set aside. The appeal is partly allowed. Issues:Classification of Tetmosol Soap under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985Liability of penalty under Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944Classification Issue:The appellant, engaged in soap manufacturing, classified Tetmosol Soap as 'Soap, other than for toilet use' under sub heading 3401.11. The department argued for reclassification as toilet soap under sub-heading 3401.19. Tribunal's previous order held Tetmosol soap as toilet soap under Chapter heading 3401.19, settling the classification issue against the appellants.Penalty Liability Issue:The question of whether the appellants should pay a penalty equal to the duty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 was raised. The appellant cited a Tribunal decision and a Supreme Court case to argue against the penalty. The department contended that the penalty was rightly imposed under Section 11AC. The Tribunal noted that penalty under Section 11AC is applicable only in cases of suppression of facts, mis-declaration, fraud, or collusion. As the show cause notice lacked allegations or evidence of such, the penalty could not be imposed. The Tribunal emphasized that the issue was not finalized during the earlier period, making the imposition of penalty unjustified. Consequently, the penalty under Section 11AC was set aside, and the appellants were directed to pay the demanded duty with applicable interest. The appeal was partly allowed.This judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad addressed the classification of Tetmosol Soap under the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 and the liability of penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal upheld the reclassification of Tetmosol Soap as toilet soap, settling the classification issue against the appellants. Regarding the penalty liability, the Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 11AC could not be imposed due to the absence of allegations of suppression of facts, mis-declaration, fraud, or collusion in the show cause notice. The decision highlighted that the issue was not finalized during the earlier period, making the penalty unjustified. Consequently, the penalty was set aside, and the appellants were instructed to pay the demanded duty with applicable interest.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found