Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was barred by limitation under section 144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on account of the date on which the Dispute Resolution Panel directions were received by the Assessing Officer, and whether electronic transmission through the portal constituted receipt for computing the limitation period.
Analysis: The statutory scheme under section 144C(13) requires the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment within one month from the end of the month in which the DRP directions are received. The order relied on the principle that in the faceless assessment framework, communication uploaded on the departmental portal constitutes receipt when it enters the recipient's computer resource. The absence of contrary material from the Revenue meant the date of communication of the DRP directions was treated as the date of upload, and the subsequent assessment order was tested against that date for limitation. Applying the jurisdictional precedent on strict compliance with the mandatory time limit, the assessment order dated 19.07.2024 was found to have been passed beyond the permissible period.
Conclusion: The assessment order was held to be time-barred and invalid, and the ground challenging limitation was accepted.