Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to condonation of delay under section 119(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for filing a revised return and claiming additional refund beyond the six-year limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 9/2015 dated 09.06.2015.
Analysis: The petitioner sought permission to file a revised return for assessment year 2012-13 on the ground that TDS had been credited belatedly. The application was found to be beyond six years from the end of the relevant assessment year, and the circular expressly bars entertaining condonation applications for refund or loss claims beyond that period. The case also did not satisfy the requirement that the claim be correct, genuine, and based on genuine hardship. The Court further noted that no assessment order had been passed under sections 143(1) or 143(3), and that the petitioner's attempt was effectively to obtain an additional refund by revising the return after the limitation period had expired.
Conclusion: The request for condonation of delay was not maintainable and was rejected; the writ petition failed.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the rejection of the condonation application was not accepted, and the impugned order was sustained, resulting in dismissal of the writ petition.
Ratio Decidendi: A condonation application for filing a revised return and claiming refund cannot be entertained beyond the six-year limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 9/2015, and relief under section 119(2)(b) is unavailable unless the claim is within time and satisfies the requirement of a correct, genuine claim based on genuine hardship.