Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund application could be rejected as time-barred under Section 54(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 in view of the exclusion of the period from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2022, and whether the rejection order required interference.
Analysis: The refund claim had been rejected solely on limitation. A subsequent notification issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs directed exclusion of the period from 1 March 2020 to 28 February 2022 for computing limitation for refund claims under Sections 54 and 55 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. On that basis, the limitation objection no longer survived for the refund applications in question, and the State accepted that the matter should be reconsidered.
Conclusion: The rejection on limitation was unsustainable and the refund application was to be restored for fresh processing on merits without raising the issue of limitation.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an applicable exclusion period is notified for computing limitation under the refund provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, a rejection founded only on the excluded period cannot be sustained.