TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC Dismisses Special Leave Petition, Upholds High Court Order, Disposes Pending Applications, and Condoned Filing Delay.</h1> <h3>ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS. Versus CG POWER AND INDUSTRIAL SOLUTIONS LTD. & ANR.</h3> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition, choosing not to interfere with the HC's impugned order. The Court also disposed of any pending applications ... Condonation of delay in filing of revised return of income - CBDT rejecting petitioner’s application u/s 119 - delay in filing the returns of Income based on the recasted accounts - Resignation by the statutory auditors happened before completing their term and reference made to unauthorised and undisclosed transactions - HC [2024 (5) TMI 502 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] decided when the order u/s 130 (2) of the Companies Act has been passed by the NCLT to recast the accounts on an application filed by the MCA, Government of India and the accounts have been recasted and accepted by the NCLT and also filed with the RoC under the Ministry of Corporate affairs, how could the Income Tax Department raise such frivolous objections that the delay in filing the returns of Income based on the recasted accounts should not be even condoned. Also Petitioner shall file physical returns of income based on books of account, revised/recasted under Section 130 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013, as taken on record by the NCLT for A.Y. 2015-16 to A.Y. 2020-21 before the JAO within 30 days from the date this order is uploaded. HELD THAT:- Having heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioners and having gone through the materials on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. The Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice J. B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan, issued an order regarding a Special Leave Petition. The Court, after hearing arguments from the petitioner's counsel, including Senior Advocate Mr. Rupesh Kumar and others, decided not to interfere with the impugned order from the High Court. Consequently, the Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition and disposed of any pending applications. The delay in filing was condoned.
TaxTMI 
