Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether toasted bread was classifiable under Entry 34 of Schedule A of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 as bread, or under Entry 77B of Schedule B as rusk or hardened bread, and whether any substantial question of law arose from the Tribunal's decision.
Analysis: The product was found to be essentially bread, but the statutory scheme treated bread and toasted bread differently by providing separate entries. Entry 34 covered bread, while Entry 77B covered mixture, bhujia, namkin, farshan and rusk, that is, hardened bread. The product, being toasted bread, was treated as hardened bread and therefore fell within the taxable entry. The earlier decisions relied upon were found inapplicable because the corresponding statutory setting and entry structure were materially different. On that basis, no confusion in the Tribunal's factual finding was accepted and no substantial question of law was seen to arise.
Conclusion: The toasted bread was held to fall under the taxable entry in Schedule B and not under the exempt bread entry in Schedule A. The challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The revision was dismissed after upholding the classification adopted by the Tribunal and the absence of any substantial question of law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statute provides separate entries for bread and for rusk or hardened bread, toasted bread may be classified under the latter taxable entry if the factual finding is that the product is hardened bread.