TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>GST Rule 96(10) faces constitutional challenge as government amends conflicting provisions in Rule 86(4B)(b)</h1> <h3>M/s Saru Silver Alloys Pvt Ltd Versus Union of India and 7 others</h3> The Allahabad HC issued notice in a case challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The petitioner argued that the ... Constitutional validity of provisions of Rule 96 (10) of the CGST Rules, 2017 - Submissions also made that the Central Government itself though prospectively by notification dated 08.10.2024 has amended Rule 86 (4B) (b) wherein the provision 'in contravention of sub-rule (10) of Rule 96' has been omitted. HELD THAT:- Issue notice. In the case before the Allahabad High Court, the petitioner challenged the application of Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, which the Kerala High Court had previously struck down in M/s. Sance Laboratories Private Limited Vs. Union of India & Ors. The petitioner also pointed out that the Gujarat High Court's judgment in Cosmo Films Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors., which the authority relied upon, had been reviewed. Additionally, the Central Government had amended Rule 86(4B)(b) to omit the provision 'in contravention of sub-rule (10) of Rule 96' as of October 8, 2024. The court issued a notice and ordered a stay on the recovery actions pursuant to the order dated April 16, 2024, as rectified on June 12, 2024, pending further orders. A counter affidavit is to be filed within six weeks, with a rejoinder affidavit due two weeks thereafter.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
