TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Petitions, Leaves Question of Law Open; Judgment Not a Precedent Due to Time Lapse.</h1> <h3>DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT Versus C. PARTHASARTHY</h3> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, choosing not to interfere with the impugned order due to the passage of time and subsequent developments. ... Maintainability of SLP - Time limitation - HELD THAT:- Though on a prima facie view, the submissions made by learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is agreed, in view of the fact that the impugned order has been passed more than two and a half years ago, and much water has flown under the bridge thereafter, it is not required to interfere with the impugned order(s). SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court, with Justices M. M. Sundresh and Aravind Kumar presiding, addressed the matter involving the petitioner, represented by Mr. Suryaprakash V Raju, A.S.G., and others, and the respondent, represented by Mr. Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv., and others. Despite agreeing 'on a prima facie view' with the petitioner's counsel, the Court decided not to interfere with the impugned order due to the passage of time ('more than two and a half years') and subsequent developments. Consequently, the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed. The Court emphasized that the impugned judgment(s) 'will not be treated as a precedent,' while leaving the 'question of law... open.' Any pending applications were also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
