Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Delhi HC Directs Ministry to Fix Website for GST Concession Certificate Applications or Accept Paper Forms in 10 Days.</h1> <h3>NANDAN MUKHERJEE Versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HEAVY INDUSTRIES</h3> In the case before the Delhi HC, the petitioner, with a 75% locomotor disability, sought a GST Concession Certificate to purchase a vehicle. Due to ... Seeking to direct the Respondent/Ministry of Heavy Industries to issue a GST Concession Certificate “the Certificate” for enabling Petitioner to purchase a four-wheeler - HELD THAT:- Respondent shall resolve the issue pertaining to error in the website enabling the Petitioner to submit his application for grant of GST Concession Certificate on time. Petition disposed off. In the case before the Delhi High Court, presided over by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA, the petitioner, represented by Mr. Sagar Shivam Jaiswal, sought a directive for the Ministry of Heavy Industries to issue a GST Concession Certificate. This certificate would enable the petitioner, a person with 75% locomotor disability, to purchase a four-wheeler. Despite possessing a Unique Disability ID Card (UDID Card) issued on July 5, 2024, the petitioner faced persistent errors when attempting to apply for the certificate online, including messages such as 'UDID number does not exist' and 'Website is under Maintenance.'The respondent, represented by Mr. Manish Rohilla and others, noted that no prior contact was made before the petition. The petitioner's counsel countered, stating grievances were raised via helpline numbers without resolution.The Court ordered the respondent to rectify the website issue, allowing the petitioner to submit his application timely. If unresolved within ten days, the respondent must accept and process a paper application per legal standards. The Court did not opine on the petitioner's eligibility, leaving all rights and contentions open, and disposed of the petition and pending applications.