TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals for 160-Day Filing Delay; Custom Excise Tribunal's Order Upheld, No Law Questions Resolved.</h1> <h3>COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND ST BHAVNAGAR Versus DG NAKRANI</h3> The SC dismissed the civil appeals due to a 'gross delay of 160 days in filing' and '35 days in refiling,' which the appellant did not adequately justify. ... Condonaton of gross delay of 160 days in filing these appeals and 35 days in refiling which has not been satisfactorily explained by the appellant - Exemption from service tax - it was held by CESTAT that the services are eligible for exemption - HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 23-02-2024 passed by the Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Ahmedabad. The Civil Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay as well as merits. In the Supreme Court judgment, Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan addressed the appeals filed by the petitioner. The Court noted a 'gross delay of 160 days in filing these appeals and 35 days in refiling,' which the appellant failed to satisfactorily explain. After reviewing the arguments and materials presented, the Court found 'no reason to interfere with the impugned order dated 23-02-2024' from the Custom Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench at Ahmedabad. Consequently, the Civil Appeals were dismissed 'on the ground of delay as well as merits.' The Court left the 'question of law, if any,' open and disposed of any pending applications.
TaxTMI 
