Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the designated authority could reopen a concluded settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by issuing a fresh Form No. 3 after a certificate had already been issued and payment made.
Analysis: The declaration under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 was filed in respect of a tax arrear arising from a pending income-tax appeal. The statutory scheme provides for determination of the amount payable, issuance of a certificate under Section 5, withdrawal of the pending appeal upon such certificate, and finality of the matters covered by the certificate. Once the declarant pays the determined amount and a Form No. 5 certificate is issued, the designated authority has no statutory power to reopen the settled dispute. A fresh Form No. 3 purporting to modify the earlier settlement is therefore without authority of law.
Conclusion: The fresh certificate was impermissible and liable to be set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a settlement under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has culminated in issuance of the statutory certificate and payment of the determined amount, the designated authority becomes functus officio and cannot reopen the concluded settlement in the absence of express statutory power.