Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (12) TMI 1164 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT allows appeal on undisclosed stock addition under Section 69B, deletes excess closing stock addition after proper calculation The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee's appeal regarding undisclosed stock addition under Section 69B, finding no deficit in closing stock after proper ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            ITAT allows appeal on undisclosed stock addition under Section 69B, deletes excess closing stock addition after proper calculation

                            The ITAT Delhi allowed the assessee's appeal regarding undisclosed stock addition under Section 69B, finding no deficit in closing stock after proper calculation eliminating profit element on finished goods. The tribunal deleted the addition made by CIT(A) for excess closing stock. Regarding car expenses, ITAT allowed the assessee's claim, rejecting CIT(A)'s ad hoc disallowance of maintenance expenses since partners had personal vehicles for personal use. Car depreciation was properly allowed as statutory entitlement. For unaccounted sales addition under Section 69A, ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s application of 28.10% gross profit rate, noting only profit element should be taxed when unaccounted purchases correspond to unaccounted sales.




                            Issues Involved:

                            1. Restriction of addition under Section 69B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, concerning alleged undisclosed stock.
                            2. Disallowance of car running and maintenance expenditure and car depreciation.
                            3. Addition under Section 69A of the Income-tax Act related to unexplained cash credit.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Restriction of Addition under Section 69B:

                            The core issue revolves around the addition of Rs 91,08,879/- under Section 69B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to alleged undisclosed stock. A search operation under Section 132 was conducted, revealing discrepancies between the physical stock valued by the search party and the recorded closing stock. The search party valued the inventory at Rs 11,12,45,367/-, while the AO calculated the recorded value at Rs 5,67,92,915/-, leading to an addition of Rs 5,44,07,085/- for excess stock. The assessee contested this, arguing that the valuation was flawed as it used market rates instead of the lower of weighted average cost or market price. The CIT(A) recalculated the closing stock using the current year's gross profit rate of 28.10%, arriving at a revised closing stock of Rs 10,20,91,121/-, thus reducing the excess stock to Rs 91,08,879/-. However, the tribunal found that the correct closing stock should have been Rs 10,12,53,736/-, eliminating any deficit and leading to the deletion of the addition.

                            2. Disallowance of Car Running and Maintenance Expenditure and Car Depreciation:

                            The assessee claimed deductions for car depreciation and running expenses, which the AO partially disallowed, suspecting personal use by partners. The CIT(A) reduced this disallowance and allowed full depreciation, recognizing it as a statutory allowance. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing that the books of accounts were not rejected and the partners had personal vehicles, negating the assumption of personal use of the firm's vehicles. Therefore, the tribunal deleted the ad hoc disallowance of Rs 2 lakhs for car maintenance expenses and upheld the allowance of car depreciation.

                            3. Addition under Section 69A:

                            The issue here pertains to the addition of Rs 29,56,800/- as unexplained cash credit under Section 69A, based on a seized document indicating unaccounted cash transactions. The assessee initially admitted to receiving cash from three parties but later contended that these were rough jottings related to demands for payments. The CIT(A) found that the entries represented unaccounted sales and estimated the gross profit on these sales at 28.10%, reducing the addition to Rs 8,30,861/-. The tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting that unaccounted sales imply unaccounted purchases, and only the profit element should be taxed. The tribunal found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s application of the gross profit rate and dismissed the revenue's appeal on this ground.

                            In conclusion, the tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the addition under Section 69B and the disallowance of car expenses, while dismissing the revenue's appeal concerning the addition under Section 69A. The tribunal's decisions were based on a detailed examination of the facts, ensuring that only justified amounts were taxed.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found