Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition was declined on the ground of an efficacious appellate remedy under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 despite the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal not being functional, and whether interim protection was warranted against recovery of the refunded amount.
Analysis: The order records that the High Court had declined to entertain the writ petition by referring to the statutory appeal under Section 112. It also notices that the appellate tribunal had not yet been made functional, and that the respondents suggested filing of an appeal with pre-deposit. The Court further directed a report on the non-functioning of the tribunal and noticed that the department was seeking recovery of an amount already refunded to the assessee.
Outcome: Notice was issued, a report was called for on the functional status of the tribunal, and the departmental order requiring repayment of the refunded amount was stayed in operation.