TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>SC Dismisses Petitions Due to Unjustified Delay; No Grounds Found to Challenge HC Orders; Pending Applications Disposed.</h1> <h3>THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s NITESH HOUSING DEVELOPER PVT. LTD.</h3> The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petitions due to a significant delay of 161 and 269 days in filing, which the petitioner failed to justify adequately. ... Claim of Deduction/ expenses on interest/redemption premium on debentures - liability to pay interest/redemption premium has not crystallized during the year - delay filling SLP - as decided by HC [2022 (8) TMI 914 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT] premium payable quantified on redemption of debentures as Revenue expenditure.Adverse finding recorded by the ITAT that the parties had changed the agreement to suit their convenience and that it is a 'make-believe' story is not supported by any cogent reason nor material on record and therefore, untenable. HELD THAT:- There is a gross delay of 161 and 269 days respectively in filing the Special Leave Petitions which has not been satisfactorily explained by the petitioner. Even otherwise, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the High Court. Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed on the ground of delay as well as on merits. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions due to a gross delay of 161 and 269 days in filing, which was not satisfactorily explained by the petitioner. The Court found no reason to interfere with the impugned orders passed by the High Court. Pending applications were also disposed of.
TaxTMI 
