Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's declaration under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was liable to be rejected on the ground that the duty demand had not been quantified on or before 30 June 2019.
Analysis: The petitioner's statement recorded pursuant to summons before 30 June 2019 contained an admission of liability, and the petitioner had also informed the department of the service tax paid prior to that date. The Scheme disqualifies a declarant only where there is no quantification on or before 30 June 2019. A later show cause notice or a difference between the amount stated in the declaration and the amount in the notice does not, by itself, negate prior quantification. The Scheme also contemplates verification of figures and a counter-offer by the designated authority, which stage was not reached because the declaration was rejected at the threshold.
Conclusion: The rejection of the petitioner's declaration was unsustainable. The petitioner was eligible to avail the Scheme, and the authorities were bound to accept the declaration and complete the consequential processing under the Scheme.
Ratio Decidendi: For the purpose of the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, prior quantification of duty before 30 June 2019 is sufficient to avoid disqualification, and a later assessment or a difference in figures does not by itself make the declarant ineligible.