Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the cancellation of GST registration for non-filing of returns warranted interference in writ jurisdiction and whether the petitioner could be permitted to seek revocation of cancellation under the CGST Act.
Analysis: The registration had been cancelled for continuous non-filing of GST returns. The petitioner expressed readiness to file the pending returns and deposit the outstanding tax, interest, penalty and late fee, if any. The parties were in consensus that the dispute stood covered by an earlier order of the Court, and the respondent did not oppose that course. In that background, the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to invoke the statutory remedy for revocation of cancellation and with a direction to the competent authority to decide such application in accordance with law within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The petitioner was permitted to move an application for revocation of cancellation under Section 30(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, subject to filing the pending returns and clearing the dues, and the competent authority was directed to consider the application as per law.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to cancellation was not adjudicated on merits, but the petitioner obtained liberty to pursue statutory revocation and the matter was closed with a direction for consideration by the authority.