Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of input tax credit under section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST enactments required reconsideration in the light of section 16(5), and whether the impugned orders should be set aside to that extent with a direction for fresh orders.
Analysis: The challenge related to denial of input tax credit for the relevant financial years on the basis of section 16(4). The petitioner relied on the later insertion of section 16(5) and sought reconsideration of the earlier denial. The competent authority was directed to re-examine the claim by taking note of section 16(5) and to afford the petitioner an opportunity of hearing before passing fresh orders.
Conclusion: The denial of input tax credit to the extent founded on section 16(4) was set aside for fresh consideration under section 16(5), with a direction to pass fresh orders after hearing the petitioner.