TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount received towards freight and transit insurance for transportation of goods by the assessee itself was taxable as a service or fell within the negative list; (ii) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on services relating to hiring of water tankers, mechanized canteen cleaning, catering, and short-term accommodation or hotel services.
Issue (i): Whether the amount received towards freight and transit insurance for transportation of goods by the assessee itself was taxable as a service or fell within the negative list.
Analysis: The assessee was not a Goods Transport Agency or courier agency. The period was after the 1 July 2012 regime, under which services are taxable except those specifically covered by the negative list. Transportation of goods by road by a non-GTA is covered by the negative list, and the assessee had also separately discharged service tax on GTA services availed through approved transport agencies under reverse charge. The amount in dispute represented the assessee's own transportation activity along with freight facilitation and insurance, which remained within the exempted category.
Conclusion: The demand of service tax on the freight and insurance receipts was unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on services relating to hiring of water tankers, mechanized canteen cleaning, catering, and short-term accommodation or hotel services.
Analysis: The disputed services were connected with statutory obligations under the Factories Act, 1948, including cleanliness, drinking water, seating, and canteen facilities. The credit definition in Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 is inclusive in nature and extends to services used in relation to business, while the exclusion operates only where the services are for personal use or consumption of employees. The accommodation and allied services were used for training, inspection, and acceptance-related activities, and not for personal consumption.
Conclusion: The denial of Cenvat credit was incorrect and the credit was held admissible in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order did not survive and the assessee obtained relief on both the tax demand and the credit disallowance.
Ratio Decidendi: Transportation of goods by road by an assessee that is not a Goods Transport Agency falls within the negative list, and services mandated by factory law or used for business-related operations qualify as admissible input services unless they are shown to be for personal use or consumption.
TaxTMI 
