TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Due to Delay; Petitioner Can Pursue 2018 Statutory Appeal Independently.</h1> <h3>BIHAR POLICE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION PVT. LTD. Versus PRINCIPAL CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ORS.</h3> The SC dismissed the SLP due to a 344-day delay in filing, with the reasons for delay not deemed satisfactory for condonation. The petitioner retains the ... Depreciation @ 50% on a building claiming it to be a temporary structure -Nature of expenditure - HC [2023 (7) TMI 1490 - PATNA HIGH COURT] held that as only 10% depreciation for buildings other than used for residential purpose and not covered by subitems 1 and 3 there is absolutely no valid claim for the assessee to obtain a 50% depreciation. HELD THAT:- There is gross delay of 344 days in filing this Special Leave Petition. The reasons assigned are neither satisfactory nor sufficient in law to be condoned. Hence, the application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition also stands dismissed. Petitioner submitted that the petitioner has also filed a statutory appeal in the year 2018. It is needless to say that the petitioner is at liberty to prosecute the said appeal in accordance with law and on its own merits. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a gross delay of 344 days in filing, with reasons not deemed satisfactory for condonation. The petitioner can pursue a statutory appeal filed in 2018 independently. Any pending applications are disposed of.
TaxTMI 
