1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Provisional Attachments under CGST: Court Disposes Petition, Allows Challenge to New Order, But Issue Remains Unresolved.</h1> The HC addressed the provisional attachment of cash credit accounts under the CGST Act, 2017. It observed that attachment orders last for one year and ... Provisional attachment of cash credit accounts of the petitioners - maximum period for attachment of cash credit accounts in terms of Section 83(2) of the CGST Act - HELD THAT:- In view of the admitted position that the order, subject matter of these proceedings has ceased to operate, the petition is disposed of reserving the right of the petitioner to impugn the fresh attachment order dated 13.12.2023 in accordance with law. The question of validity of repeated issuance of attachment orders under Section 83 of the CGST Act is left open. Petition disposed off. The High Court judgment pertains to the provisional attachment of cash credit accounts under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The court noted that attachment orders have a one-year duration and cease to operate after that period. A fresh attachment order was issued, leading to the petitioner's challenge. The petition was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to challenge the new attachment order. The validity of repeated attachment orders under Section 83 of the CGST Act was left open.