Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order was liable to be set aside for denial of personal hearing and whether the consequential bank attachment could survive.
Analysis: The petitioner's case was examined with reference to Rule 86B of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and the exception claimed thereunder. The order was passed without affording a personal hearing, even though the petitioner's reply was not filed due to lack of effective notice of the proceedings. The absence of a hearing amounted to a violation of the principles of natural justice. Once the assessment order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, the bank attachment based on that order could not continue.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration, and the bank attachment was lifted. The relief was in favour of the assessee.