Bail granted on case-specific grounds, with trial-cooperation conditions imposed and the proceedings directed to be expedited.

The Court granted bail on the basis of the peculiar facts, including the period of incarceration, and set aside the order refusing bail. It directed the Trial Court to impose conditions requiring full cooperation with the trial, no interference with witnesses, and no departure from the country without leave. Noting that trial had commenced but only two of forty-six witnesses had been examined, the Court requested expedition of the proceedings.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to bail and whether the impugned order refusing bail should be set aside.

Analysis: Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration, the Court found it appropriate to grant bail. The order also directed the Trial Court to impose conditions requiring full cooperation with the trial, non-interference with witnesses, and restraint on leaving the country without leave of the Trial Court. In view of the commencement of trial and examination of only two out of forty-six witnesses, the Trial Court was requested to expedite the proceedings.

Conclusion: Bail was granted and the impugned order was set aside, in favour of the appellant.

---