Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether persons who are not signatories to the dishonoured cheque can be summoned for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 when the cheque is alleged to have been issued on behalf of a proprietorship concern.
Analysis: Section 138 fastens criminal liability on the drawer of the cheque, and prosecution under that provision is maintainable against the person who has drawn and signed the cheque. Where the cheque is admittedly signed by a third person and not by the petitioners, and there is no clear assertion that such person was authorised to sign on behalf of the petitioners, the foundational requirement for fastening liability under Section 138 is not met. The Court also noted that while a proprietorship has no separate legal entity and proceedings may lie against the sole proprietor, that principle does not extend liability to a non-signatory in the absence of legally sufficient averments. Any civil liability, if otherwise available, was distinguished from criminal prosecution under Section 138.
Conclusion: The petitioners, being non-signatories to the cheques, could not be summoned under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the summoning orders were set aside.
Ratio Decidendi: Criminal liability under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can be fastened only on the drawer and signatory of the cheque, and a non-signatory cannot be prosecuted absent legally sufficient averments of authorised issuance on its behalf.