Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, while granting stay of enforcement of a money award under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the Court could direct only furnishing of a bank guarantee and treat a statutory undertaking differently from a private party.
Analysis: The proviso to Section 36(3) requires the Court, in a money award, to have due regard to the principles governing stay of money decrees under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. That framework does not permit special treatment merely because the judgment debtor is a statutory body. The arbitral award contained multiple monetary components, and the stay order dealt only with one component while ignoring the remaining claims. The form of security and the conditions for stay must be fixed by applying the statutory scheme and not by subjective assessments about whether a party is a fly-by-night operator or by its institutional character.
Conclusion: The direction to secure the entire award only by bank guarantee was unsustainable, and the stay order required modification by directing deposit of a substantial part of the decretal amount as a condition for stay.