Bail refusal set aside where co-accused had bail and the complaint was filed; trial court may impose conditions.

The Supreme Court set aside the orders refusing bail after noting that a co-accused had already been granted bail and that the complaint had been filed. It held that the earlier condition related only to interim bail and clarified that the trial court could impose appropriate conditions while granting bail. Bail was therefore granted to the appellant, subject to terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned orders refusing bail deserved to be set aside and the appellant released on bail.

Analysis: The Court noted that the co-accused had already been granted bail and that the complaint had been filed. In view of these circumstances, the Court found it to interfere with the impugned orders. The Court also clarified that the earlier condition was only for interim bail and that the trial court would remain free to impose appropriate conditions while granting bail.

Conclusion: The impugned orders were set aside and bail was granted to the appellant on terms and conditions to the satisfaction of the trial court.

---