Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules should be condoned and whether the application for revocation of cancellation should be considered upon compliance with statutory dues and formalities.
Analysis: The Court recorded the statement of the departmental counsel that, if the delay in filing the revocation application was condoned and the petitioner complied with the requirements of payment of taxes, interest, late fee, penalty and other dues, the return would be accepted. In that view, the Court condoned the delay in invoking the proviso to Rule 23 and directed that, subject to deposit of all taxes, interest, late fee, penalty and compliance with other formalities, the application for revocation be considered in accordance with law. The Court also directed opening of the portal to enable filing of the GST return upon compliance.
Conclusion: The delay was condoned and consequential relief was granted, but the petitioner's entitlement to revocation and filing facility remained conditional upon full compliance with the stated requirements.