Premature writ challenge to anti-dumping product scope rejected while the statutory investigation remained ongoing.

A writ petition under Article 226 challenging an ongoing anti-dumping investigation and the inclusion of the importer's product in the product under consideration was treated as premature. The Court held that, where the statutory investigation under Rules 4, 5 and 6 of the Anti-Dumping Rules was still in progress, interference on the disputed scope determination would prejudice the process. It therefore declined to examine the merits of the product scope objection and refused interference at the investigation stage.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the writ petition challenging the anti-dumping investigation and the final scope of the product under consideration was premature and liable to be entertained at the investigation stage.

Issue (i): Whether the writ petition challenging the anti-dumping investigation and the final scope of the product under consideration was premature and liable to be entertained at the investigation stage.

Analysis: The petition was filed under Article 226 in the context of an ongoing anti-dumping investigation under Rules 4, 5 and 6 of the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Article) Rules, 1995. The grievance related to inclusion of the petitioner's imported product in the product under consideration and to communications issued during the course of the investigation. The Court noted that the investigation was still in progress and that interference on merits at that stage would prejudice the statutory process. It therefore declined to examine the disputed scope determination and treated the challenge as premature.

Conclusion: The petition was premature and not entertained on merits.

Final Conclusion: The Court declined to interfere with the ongoing anti-dumping investigation and dismissed the petition at the threshold.

---