Appellate interference refused where the Tribunal's factual view was found correct, leaving its decision undisturbed.

Interference with the Tribunal's view was refused because, on the facts, the Court found that view to be correct. The civil appeal was therefore dismissed, and the Tribunal's decision was left undisturbed. The issue was answered against the appellant and in favour of the assessee, reflecting the principle that appellate interference is not warranted where the lower forum's factual view is sustainable on the record.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's view called for interference in the civil appeal.

Analysis: The appeal was heard on the question whether the impugned judgment required interference. On the facts, the Court found the Tribunal's view to be correct and saw no reason to interfere.

Conclusion: The issue was answered against the appellant and in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The civil appeal was dismissed, leaving the Tribunal's decision undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Interference is not warranted where the Tribunal's view is found to be correct on the facts of the case.

---