Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order was liable to be set aside for want of a reasonable opportunity and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The tax demand had been made on a best judgment basis after non-response to notice and non-appearance at the personal hearing. The petitioner asserted lack of knowledge of the proceedings and absence of a meaningful opportunity to contest the proposal on merits. In these circumstances, the interest of justice warranted reconsideration, but on terms requiring a deposit of 10% of the disputed tax demand before the petitioner could be heard afresh.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside conditionally, the petitioner was permitted to file a reply after remitting 10% of the disputed tax demand, and the authority was directed to grant a reasonable opportunity, including personal hearing, and pass a fresh order thereafter.