100% EOU entitled to interest on delayed refund of pre-deposit made following tribunal direction

CESTAT Kolkata held that appellant, a 100% EOU, was entitled to interest on delayed refund of pre-deposit made pursuant to tribunal direction dated 09.09.2014. The pre-deposit was made on 11.11.2014 and tribunal order favored appellant. Following Punjab and Haryana HC decision in Riba Textiles Ltd., which affirmed CESTAT Chandigarh ruling, appellant was granted interest on pre-deposit from deposit date until realization. Appeal disposed of in favor of appellant.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Entitlement to interest on the refund of pre-deposit.
2. Applicability of legal precedents concerning interest on delayed refunds.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Entitlement to Interest on Refund of Pre-Deposit:

The primary issue in this case revolves around the appellant's claim for interest on the refund of a pre-deposit amounting to Rs. 16,18,165/-. The appellant, a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU), had made this pre-deposit in compliance with a stay order from the CESTAT, Kolkata, dated 09.09.2014. Upon the favorable final order dated 11.08.2023, which set aside previous adverse orders, the appellant sought a refund of the pre-deposit along with interest. However, the Assistant Commissioner sanctioned the refund without interest, prompting the appellant to appeal this decision.

The appellant argued that under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944, they were entitled to interest on the delayed refund. They supported their claim by referencing the Tribunal's decision in Riba Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of C. Ex., Panchkula, which was affirmed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, establishing a precedent for granting interest on such refunds.

2. Applicability of Legal Precedents:

The appellant relied heavily on the decision in Riba Textiles Ltd., where the Tribunal and subsequently the High Court recognized the entitlement to interest on delayed refunds under the Central Excise Act. The High Court's decision referenced the Supreme Court's ruling in Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT, Pune, which underscored the principle that interest on delayed refunds is a statutory right when the refund is unjustifiably withheld.

In the present case, the Tribunal found that the appellant's pre-deposit was made following a Tribunal order and that the final order was in the appellant's favor, thus entitling them to interest from the date of deposit until realization. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the Central Excise Act, 1944, are pari materia, making the Supreme Court's ruling in Sandvik Asia Ltd. applicable here.

The Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to interest on the pre-deposit from 11.11.2014 until the refund's realization. This decision aligns with the legal precedent set by higher courts, affirming the appellant's right to interest on delayed refunds.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal's judgment resolved the appellant's entitlement to interest on the refund of the pre-deposit, relying on established legal precedents. The appeal was accordingly disposed of, granting the appellant interest on the pre-deposit from the date of its payment until its realization.

---