Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Taxpayer Wins: GST Demand Invalidated Due to Procedural Defect in Hearing Notice Under Section 73</h1> <h3>M/s D.R Construction Ramnagar Road, Faizabad Thru. Its Partner Kaushal Kishore Pandey Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Commercial Tax Deptt. Lucknow And 2 Others</h3> HC quashed GST demand orders due to lack of hearing opportunity under Section 73. State granted liberty to issue fresh demand order after providing proper ... Maintainability of appeal - appeal dismissed as being beyond limitation - opportunity of hearing not provided - violation of principles of natural justice - HELD THAT:- Considering the mandate of Section 75(4) of the GST Act as well as the following the judgment in PARTY TIME HOSPITALITY PROP. SMT. PUNITA GUPTA LKO. [2023 (9) TMI 48 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT], which is squarely covered to the facts of the present case, the impugned orders dated 21.02.2022 (Annexure-2) and 14.03.2024 (Annexure-1) are quashed giving liberty to the State to file a fresh demand order in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing. The authority shall pass order indicating the date of hearing as well as the time and place of the hearing in specific term and shall proceed accordingly in accordance with law - the writ petition is disposed off. The High Court quashed the orders dated 21.01.2022 and 14.03.2024 for lack of opportunity of hearing under Section 73 of GST Act. The State has liberty to file a fresh demand order after granting opportunity of hearing. The authority must specify the date, time, and place of the hearing in the new order. The writ petition is disposed of.