Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under Section 73 of the GST regime and the appellate order dismissing the appeal as time-barred could be sustained when no opportunity of hearing was granted in terms of Section 75(4).
Analysis: The pleadings and the impugned order showed no denial that no hearing notice or opportunity was afforded before passing the demand order. The mandate of prior hearing under Section 75(4) was applied, and the matter was treated as covered by the earlier decision relied upon by the petitioner on the same point.
Conclusion: The orders dated 21.01.2022 and 14.03.2024 were set aside for breach of the requirement of hearing, with liberty to proceed afresh in accordance with law after giving an opportunity of hearing.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the demand and appellate orders were annulled on the ground of denial of hearing, while leaving the department free to initiate fresh proceedings after due notice.
Ratio Decidendi: An order under the GST law passed without affording the statutorily mandated opportunity of hearing cannot be sustained and is liable to be quashed.