TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Dismissal Due to 586-Day Delay Leaves Substantive Legal Question Unresolved for Future Adjudication.</h1> <h3>PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 Versus AMADEUS INDIA LTD.</h3> The SC dismissed the SLP citing an unjustified delay of 586 days in filing. The dismissal was procedural, and the substantive question of law remains ... Disallowance u/s 14A if no exempt income earned -TP adjustment on account of AMP expenditure - HC [2022 (11) TMI 384 - DELHI HIGH COURT] decided assessee appeal in favour - delay filling SLP - HELD THAT:- There is a delay of 586 days in filing the Special Leave Petition which has not been satisfactorily explained. The Special leave Petition is accordingly dismissed on the ground of limitation. However, the question of law is kept open to be adjudicated in an appropriate case. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a delay of 586 days, which was not satisfactorily explained. The question of law is kept open for adjudication in a future case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
