Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal was maintainable without compliance with the mandatory pre-deposit requirement and whether the Tribunal could waive that requirement.
Analysis: The appeal could not be entertained unless the statutory pre-deposit was made. After the 2014 amendment to section 35F of the Central Excise Act, the provision operates in mandatory terms and removes any discretion to waive the deposit. Since section 35F is applicable to service tax appeals through section 83 of the Finance Act, the same consequence followed here. The cited authorities consistently hold that where the statute prescribes a pre-deposit as a condition for appeal, neither the Tribunal nor the Court can dilute or bypass that command.
Conclusion: The requirement of pre-deposit was mandatory, no waiver could be granted, and the appeal was not maintainable without compliance.