ITAT Chennai Confirms Late Fees for TDS Returns Filing Delays in 2013-14 and 2014-15; Section 234E Upheld as Substantive.

The ITAT Chennai upheld the levy of fees under section 234E for late filing of TDS returns for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15. The Tribunal concluded that section 234E is a substantive provision independent of section 200A(1)(c), which merely prescribes a recovery mechanism. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeals, affirming the imposition of late fees, and highlighted that the liability arises from the failure to timely deliver TDS statements. The decision considered conflicting judicial interpretations and supported the revenue's stance, aligning with decisions from other High Courts favoring the imposition of late fees.

---

---

Issues: Confirmation of levy of fees u/s. 234E for late filing of quarterly TDS returns.

The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai addressed the grievance of the assessee regarding the confirmation of levy of fees u/s. 234E for late filing of quarterly TDS returns for AYs 2013-14 & 2014-15. The assessee's appeal was considered deficient by the first appellate authority due to non-filing of the order issued u/s 200A. The assessee contended that since Sec. 200A(1)(c) was not introduced during the relevant assessment years, no late fees u/s 234E could be imposed. The Tribunal noted the conflicting decisions of the High Court of Madras in two cases, one favoring the assessee and the other against. After thorough consideration of various case laws, the Tribunal analyzed the provisions of section 234E of the Act. It concluded that the late fee under section 234E is a substantive provision and is not dependent on section 200A(1)(c) which only prescribes a recovery mechanism. The Tribunal emphasized that the liability to pay the late fee arises once there is a failure to deliver the TDS statement on time, and the fee continues for each day of delay. Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the challenge to the levy of late fees for the relevant assessment years.

The Tribunal highlighted that the earlier decision favoring the assessee did not consider the contrary decisions of other High Courts, namely Karnataka and Gujarat, which supported the imposition of late fees under section 234E. Based on the detailed analysis and the subsequent decision in favor of the revenue, the Tribunal upheld the levy of fees u/s 234E for the assessment years in question. Consequently, both appeals were dismissed, affirming the imposition of late filing fees under section 234E.

In conclusion, the Tribunal clarified that the late fee under section 234E of the Act is an independent substantive provision and does not rely on the introduction of section 200A(1)(c) for its applicability. The decision provides a comprehensive analysis of the legal provisions and conflicting judicial interpretations, ultimately upholding the levy of late fees for late filing of TDS returns for the relevant assessment years.

---